Category Archives: Human psyche

On Values, Consciousness and Human Nature. Some More

Posted on July 19, 2016 by anatoly

In other words, humans are “anti-adaptive” creatures, in essence, by nature – their nature. Continue reading →

Posted in Basic Ideas, dialogue, Human psyche, humanity, Philosophy, Science, Theory | Tagged adaptation, consciousness, creativity, dialogue, disruption, environment, feelings, invention, memory, perception, speech, values | Leave a comment

On the Nature of Human Values

Posted on May 30, 2016 by anatoly

[C]onsciousness reflects things as being the same in time. . . [A] thing becomes that of consciousness if and only if it becomes a value! Continue reading →

Posted in Basic Ideas, Human psyche, humanity, Philosophy, Theory | Tagged absolute, consciousness, eternity, sameness, time, value | Leave a comment

The Only Source of Human Morality

Posted on December 8, 2015 by anatoly

So, in the end, who must we humans thank for our morality? The answer is: ourselves. Continue reading →

Posted in Basic Ideas, Culture, Ethics, Human psyche, humanity, morality, Philosophy, Principles, Science, Theory | Tagged adaptation, conscience, culture, feelings, humanity, image of culture, morality, science | Leave a comment

Sources of the Human Morality (take 2)

Posted on November 4, 2015 by anatoly

Whatever is done in this case, a killing will happen. So, you need to … take the entire responsibility upon yourself. These kind of actions we term human in full meaning of the word [and they] run against “adaptive behaviour,” that is, against any biological interpretation… Continue reading →

Posted in Basic Ideas, dialogue, Ethics, Human psyche, humanity, morality, Science, Theory | Tagged adaptation, animalism, behaviour, choice, conscience, ethics, God, human nature, humanism, humanity, logic, morality | Leave a comment

Sources of Human Morality

Posted on October 23, 2015 by anatoly

[I]f we do not seek and see specifically how humans are different from animals then we don’t actually talk about different species here and use “evolution” and “adaptation” as abstract explanatory principles as successfully and effectively as other thinkers use God for that purpose. And the later is much more preferable for one reason at least: It tells us something about who we are. Continue reading →